Radja Nainggolan has publicly branded Scott McTominay an "average" midfielder despite his knack for goals, igniting debate over the Scotland international’s all-round game. Nainggolan framed his verdict by comparing himself and other top playmakers — Nicolo Barella, Kevin De Bruyne, Luka Modric — and offered a blunt take on Serie A dynamics, Inter’s title, and Roma’s inconsistency.
Nainggolan’s blunt verdict on Scott McTominay
Radja Nainggolan did not mince words, calling Scott McTominay an "average player" who lacks the technical ability to operate between the lines despite a reliable goalscoring return. The former Roma midfielder acknowledged McTominay’s habit of reaching double-digit goals but argued that scoring alone doesn’t compensate for limitations in buildup play.
What Nainggolan means by “average”
Nainggolan’s criticism targets the modern midfield premium on versatility. He suggests McTominay is a forward-thinking threat in the final third but insufficiently refined to link play, create tempo, or influence possession phases that separate good from elite central midfielders.
Comparisons to peers — Barella, De Bruyne, Modric, Çalhanoğlu
Nainggolan placed Nicolo Barella above himself for overall impact, praising Barella’s decisive contributions even when he isn’t prolific. He reserved his highest praise for Kevin De Bruyne and Luka Modric, highlighting vision and sustained world-class output. He also ranked himself ahead of Hakan Çalhanoğlu at his peak, underscoring confidence born of a combative, box-to-box profile.
Why these comparisons matter
These name checks aren’t vanity — they map a midfield spectrum. At one end are creators like De Bruyne and Modric who dictate games; in the middle are high-energy, influence-driven players like Barella; at the other are specialist goal-getters with narrower skill sets. Nainggolan’s axis clarifies his gripe: McTominay sits nearer the specialist end.
Serie A perspective: Inter, Napoli, Milan
Nainggolan said Inter’s title was predictable, citing squad depth and consistent performances as decisive. He viewed Napoli and Milan as legitimate challengers who ultimately lacked Inter’s week-to-week steadiness. That assessment frames league hierarchy around balance and durability rather than flashes of brilliance.
On Roma and Dybala — a critique of inconsistency
Turning to Roma, Nainggolan criticised their style and erratic form. He singled out Paulo Dybala, implying the Argentine’s quality raises expectations Roma have failed to meet. Nainggolan argued Roma should be perennial top-four contenders, not inconsistent outsiders.
Implications and what comes next
Nainggolan’s remarks will fuel conversations about player profiles clubs should prioritise. For McTominay, the critique highlights a narrative that could shape tactical deployment: is he a finishing-minded midfielder best used closer to goal, or can he be developed into a fuller, between-the-lines operator? For Roma and Serie A watchers, the take reinforces debates about squad construction, consistency, and the fine margins that decide titles.
Final assessment
Nainggolan’s straight-talking assessment is as much a personality statement as a tactical one.
Mourinho & his ‘worst referee’ rant gains new relevance amid latest Serie A scandal
It forces a useful distinction: goal output is valuable, but modern midfield elite are judged on control, creation, and consistency. His comments sharpen the lens through which midfielders like McTominay will be evaluated going forward.
Football Italia
